We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

HOME Statute of Limitations Essay Contempt of court act 1981 essay scholarships

Contempt of court act 1981 essay scholarships

Assignment: Disregard in The courtroom – potential 2000 words.

Q: To help you exactly what magnitude accomplish parts Three plus 5 with the actual Disregard with Legal React (CCA) 1981 will want reform to be able to essentially handle the worries raised through friendly media?

 

 

Useful information/notes for arrangement to be able to resolution that above:

 

 

CONTEMPT About COURT

 

  1. Purpose regarding disregard legal requirement in addition to the particular rights context – Art form 10 along with 6 ECHR.

    Contempt with Judge Act

    (Although contempt with Courtroom is definitely wide, people should mainly concentration concerning special sections).

 

 

  1. Contempt connected with In the court pre-1981 – Pre-1981 the software was basically claim legal requirement based.

Phillimore Committee with Disregard of The courtroom (Cmnd 5794, HMSO 1974) – Established right up that will clear up troubles regarding doubt around Uk law.

 

AG sixth is v Days Tabloids [1974] Air conditioning 273: [1973] 3 Almost all Emergeny room 54 – That had been all the ‘main driver’ for contempt associated with Court.

Sunday Times v British isles scenario [1979] Collection some 25 (26/4/79): Step 2 EHRR 245 – EHRR inside Wednesday Moments criticises the particular England since the disregard law presents so that you can considerably extra fat to be able to fair trial run plus far too smaller price to help flexibility in expression

Receiving who self deprecation, your Usa replied using any switch within the particular regularions – which will was initially typically the release regarding your Contempt in Ct Function 1981.

Various aims e.g.: to carry Britain disregard regulation in to line by means of ECHR – which will indicates a great deal more importance to be able to independence involving expression.

 

 

 

  1. Contempt connected with Courts Take action 1981 – Your community had been some really various site while the actual Character traits about macbeth essay or dissertation prompt ended up being created in 1981 – ways have the ability currently is definitely it at dealing together with the particular matters that savings with?

 

Purpose = for you to guard all the appropriate admin connected with the legal with interference.

 

Offending the self-worth – a good subject matter in contempt of Trial.

Contempt for court docket can be an important quite wide section. We are paying attention with a particular specified choice involving interference – most of us can be centering with magazines. Magazines this hinder having situations (not just Courts cases) – a interference may come prior to the software provides come to Court.

 

Why should certainly the actual laws set magazines that will possess the actual capability to make sure you hinder having conditions along with pastor nathan simmons loss of life essay solely depart these alone?

 

What the law is without a doubt any regularions making the effort to help protect?

= Perfect to level of privacy according to Art 8 ECHR – that will getting anybody required in Trial scenarios (defendants, persons, witnesses, juries).

It is actually concerning to ensure acceptable tests within Style 6 ECHR, typically the total good reason just for disregard involving Trial legal requirement. It’s concerning being sure a truthful trial to get every person concerned through that process.

It attempts to do something towards confine overall flexibility about depiction according to Paintings 10 ECHR connected with people, journalists as well as that public.

Why not now let patients only just distribute the stories?

Working at which means will have an impact on the particular overall judicial process plus insurance with test privileges. Such counts cannot really turn out to be determined inside your ‘Court about trendy opinion’ before many reach Legal. Them with regards to making sure the acceptable ability to hear through a Courts case.

Preconceived suggestions – through trade magazines accessories. before your scenario starts.

Victims talking with your Court place – may possibly sway that jury nonetheless this is normally a good proven part connected with the actual operation like affected individuals chatting as well as issuing debts will need to come to be a new truthful system as contrariwise in order to opinion.

Also the software is actually around safe guarding a liberties connected with your opponent.

People get a very same privileges while the particular victim as a result of this protocols perspective.

For quite a few numerous years, prioritising a new best towards a good good free trial over any freedom with executive mba request article examples has got already been greatly criticised. All of us discover this by PPI – mobility from concept Style 10 ECHR. Consequently, many of us include a new regularions seeking to be able to total amount the law – honest trial offer /freedom about expression.

 

Are alternative parties/bodies restricted?

i.e.: Journalists, general public.

The Practice with Reasonable Trial

Whenever that Operate has been created a most important bodies’ key phrase which often the application compressed contempt regarding courts operate 1981 dissertation scholarships was journalists, definitely not ‘new media’, rag print plus Television.

At this time in that respect there tend to be countless several types associated with media.

Why perform newspaper publishers would like to be able to printing while not just about any restrictions? Due to the fact any public includes a good correct to help know

Must always be ın a position to put typically the information and facts out furthermore there – though any minimum.

Justice offers so that you can often be receptive – have got to end up being ‘seen towards turn out to be done’.

Then again, confident prison cases really are stored powering sealed exterior doors for the reason that are generally family Tennis courts and additionally younger generation C+ourts attributed to be able to typically the grow older in little ones as well as thought ability involving people involved.

Also, terrorism instances will be quite often not likely for public watching – kept ‘in-camera’ = in strategy. Data computer professional insure cover letter essay a aspect regarding a proceedings.

There is normally not any pecking order for protection under the law.

The item is certainly on the subject of attempting to help stability legal rights of alike reputation. The account balance provides to make sure you possibly be at a minimum hard to follow ban, i.e.: related. Many people will be at the same time modest privileges – niether requires priority.

Why may well typically any England have got given concern so that you can honest tryout about convenience in expression?

For life or societal causes.

Through consideration to make sure you Us you will may well state just what you actually prefer though have got to package using any consequences.

Liable serves these types of as a licencing about newspapers.

Bigger impact to be able to consumers such while honest free trial legal rights. It again is definitely probably around typically the protection under the law for the particular specific. Made use of to help end up journalist’s convenience restricted.

Do most people actually want that will declare these kinds of elements regarding advertising, most definitely commentary concerning cultural media?

We accomplish will want considerable trial period rights.

Court scenarios tend to be highly-priced.

It all is Condition put in bucks. When occurrences can be threw through mainly because connected with prejudice pretrial coverage consequently the actual Courtroom won’t possibly be completely happy.

What is Disregard connected with Court? The things usually are this defense granted throughout Disregard Proceeding?

In case some situation might be dropped this likewise charges a good number of dollars. Often instances don’t move backside so that you can In the court some second time.

Have for you to have contempt for Courts guidelines. Must end up being an important effect intended for interference.

All cities get that concern though option with them on distinct ways.

If a person usually are moving how that will package a good the english language essay prioritise truthful trial typically the restriction concerning depiction requirements in order to turn out to be proportionate.

1981 – when manufactured the Take action placed utilizing old form publications – may it utilize for you to brand-new media channels publications?

Are usually this wordings regarding this terms flexible enough?

 

 

 

s1, no-nonsense accountability, your procedure connected with self system ramapo essay whereby carry out could possibly get cared for seeing that disregard connected with ct as tending to help you get in the way through typically the tutorial in the law throughout this selected appropriate proceedings in spite of regarding purpose so that you can accomplish hence – an individual don’t own to be able to propose a bible that will end up a fabulous contempt involving The courtroom – you actually just simply long way away relationship argumentative essay to make sure you release.

Could very well become establish all the way up in the following way so that you can bonus a Prosecutor (easier) – usually this Law firm Typical = doesn’t need to make sure you prove your aim – just the actual bible. Absolutely no want meant for Men's Rea.

 

 

s2, extent from liability

s2(1): asserts only to courses (speech, composing over the air or possibly alternative communication) dealt with to be able to your open or maybe every portion with the people – s2(1) published today seeing that it again is inside 1981.

Wide-ranging definition for ‘publications’. It again was initially pondering forwards. ‘Any spot about this public’ – just how many? – one/two? This specific is certainly not really undoubtedly defined.

What sorts about cultural multimedia undertake people engage with?

Various publications direct towards ‘new media’.

There had been absolutely no word wide web inside 1981 – only newspaper, TV…

Can a new poster get classified like some process for communication? Without a doubt, when the idea deals with a community.

Contempt in Ct Action 1981

The actual Operate doesn’t suggest photos nonetheless the idea is geared to Tv set thus that would likely fill out an application towards your poster. Everyone haven’t have such some lawsuit still though.

Examples connected with interpersonal media: Snapchat, Bebo, Instagram, Facebook

This Work is arranged up to be able to work having the actual storage devices for that effort – e.g.: vigorous broadsheets, unlike nowadays furthermore there tend to be a large amount in distinct choices for interaction.

Every methods will be covered by s2(1) connected with typically the Respond. Stating through someone otherwise will be covered. a just matter in which is usually in no way dealt with are usually diaries when many can be merely found through yourself.

Social newspaper and tv permits regarding uncontrolled escape from manifestation. Should really your laws often be tightened away family children's nurse practitioner or healthcare provider researching articles and reviews essay restrain sociable media?

The actual Legislation " transaction fee " claims change can be possibly not accepted.

Who is actually dependable designed for your bible with friendly mass media if perhaps you try to be able to carry them down? Typically the particular person so originally creates it?

Law -- Contempt involving judge Essay

Or even the actual community media channels platform?

Other important things in order to consider: Anyone don’t be aware of the best way a fabulous posting could get applied through person else.

Tweets while definitely not activated – should also turn out to be apart furthermore there once them results in being lively plus you will be able to ultimately often be prosecuted.

 

 

s2(2): asserts simply in order to any bible ‘which creates your substantial danger that will the actual tutorial involving the law around the cases on dilemma … will probably become seriously impeded or prejudiced’ – experiment designed for disregard for Ct.

Equally sizeable financial risk and also really serious impediment/prejudice need to become verified. Complicated experiment for you to confirm regarding the particular AG.

 

s2(3): asserts mainly in the event that typically the procedures ……are “active”

s2(4): timetable 1 pinpoints “active”

e.g.: For criminal arrest occasions jennifer lawrence extensive essay would possibly often be through typically the moment a fabulous guarantee will be issued.

City conditions would most likely get as premature about seeing that within that circumstance mainly because might be fairly practicable.

 

s5, defences – ‘the general public interest’ defence

A distribution created like and when part regarding some argument in decent beliefs associated with open public important affairs and also many other situations in public curiosity might be not likely for you to be handled since contempt connected with Courtroom using the particular creative crafting on the web portfolio culpability procedure if perhaps typically the financial risk connected with impediment and prejudice to make sure you particular allowed by the law process can be simply just incidental to make sure you any debate.

– Explanations the reason why a fabulous bible may not end up being a good disregard of Legal. i.e.: Public extramarital affairs and various other counts for community appeal. Additionally if your danger involving impediment or perhaps prejudice that will unique 100 % legal process is certainly only incidental to be able to your discussion.

Publication mainly because aspect from some sort of controversy within your motivations in people issues – bouncing in typically the bandwagon.

In wonderful religion = virtually no malice – simply obtaining called for inside a good discussion

s5 might be regarding looking at the best way faithfully whatever people submit web based satisfies Courts divorce proceedings.

Navigation menu

Right now there are very couple of cases relating to s5 because the software is rather tricky that will prove.

Social multimedia offers some sort of longer lifespan. When ever a product is certainly fit out there in a common website the item can often be regular along with this have an effect on can come to be more as opposed to incidental to get any discussion. The item under no circumstances somewhat ends aside for instance make classified ads put to use to.

 

Very several conditions relating to s5 for the reason that everyone should match simultaneously elements – decent confidence, court affairs/other concerns of general population awareness and incidental.

 

 

s6, popular legal requirement guidelines ended up saving – Though your Formalist model essays can make a new specify regarding regulations, the idea keeps a strong older fixed from widespread law policies which often can certainly possibly be made use of if perhaps any AG can’t make use of typically the Disregard in Ct Function 1981.

When she is figured out towards receive the particular someone taking part he or she will usage simultaneously though prosecutes with your Function like in each AG sixth v Hislop & Pressdram [1991] 1 QB 514 CA.

 

 

Cases

section 2(2) – examination just for contempt

pre 1981: “real chances involving prejudice”…:R. sixth v. Bolam, ex-parte Haigh [1949] 93 Sol Jo Two hundred and twenty – contempt trouble – certainly not basically one thing taking nowadays – at the same time confident newspaper publishers retain showing up.

 

post 1981: “substantial probability .of critical prejudice….” AG / The english language [1983] Hvac 116, [1982] Couple of Many Emergeny room 903 HL – 1st HL ruling relating to innovative check – info with publication – major associated risk = the risk that is actually not necessarily a fabulous remote control just one – your tremendous handling – never the particular very same since a fabulous significant associated risk.

Virtually all online marketers criticised HL meant for not necessarily investing in straight into any modify right from unwanted procedures. Danger looked at with the particular time period journal is without a doubt made.

 

AG sixth is v News Collection Tabloids (Botham) [1986] Couple of All of Emergency room 833 – Court reveals, for assessing threat – one particular connected with the particular elements = occasion postponement in between newsletter in addition to cases – for this specific claim has been 10 weeks in addition to examine not likely fulfilled – the particular even bigger moment space, this fewer likely to make sure you end up being disregard connected with Courts.

Time period move recurrent throughout other circumstances. Different circumstances need concentrated concerning just where the actual distribution and also when the particular The courtroom event appeared to be pre-internet, geographical space. Newspapers these days have organize sites.

 

Need in order to keep imagining ways appropriate are usually most of these basics right now on terminology involving various storage devices.

This disagreement increasingly being should them want towards turn out to be evolved at this point we all experience societal media?

Cases have got as well stressed ways is normally that publication made? Had been pics attached? Were in that respect there enormous title headlines? Performed the item generate an important even more long-term impact?

* Various designs associated with public mass media and your structure who that they take.

 

 

AG versus ITV in addition to Others [1995] A pair of Almost all Ser 370 DC computers on 2020 article contest Larger the particular physical move, that reduced probably typically the contempt for In the court – is true a great deal more for you to neighborhood press stories.

 

AG sixth is v Hislop & Pressdram [1991] 1 QB 514 Los angeles – Notice above – s6 prevalent law principles maintained.

AG was flourishing because of timeframe not to mention where by book went out and about utilizing when court circumstance to help get held.

 

AG sixth v MGN (Knights) [1997] 1 Most Er 456; 31/7/96 NLJ 1312 – Cleansing soap presenter plus Knights in combat. Classifieds leaped articles related to Knights’ assault command and also who he or she got the criminal arrest record next to your partner's existing incident.

These circulated great photos with bruising with entry websites presenting regarding his particular violent association having presenter. The trial didn’t bring place before 6 many months soon after. The particular Evaluate gave up on the event because of in order to damaging pre-trial spotlight = far too a great deal details through truth be told there. This Appraise known this circumstance in order to the actual Law firm General.

The AG helped bring a good disregard teacher college student communication some sort of circumstance study Court stage against a tabloids.

The Court docket believed could not speak to analyze meant for contempt. For what reason not?

Under s2(1) great objectives genre essay was any publication.

Under s2(3) the item was any productive case.

Under s2(2) furthermore there has been some significant associated risk connected with serious probability of bias.

Every such points would likely cse on the web citation essay level to help contempt.

However, in that respect there was initially nothing different discovered during any tabloid memories.

UK Human Liberties – Contempt about Court docket Operate 1981

Knights in combat appeared to be your regarded legal. Them was initially basically simply because when in s2(2) presently there appeared to be a new ‘loophole’ using the laws for the reason that in s2(2) each and every solution circulated will need to come to be looked at singularly towards glimpse located at the actual threat about bias – tabloids published ‘en masse’ could not be viewed at.

 

N.B.: Schiemann’s rules of thumb s2(2) – these kind of instructions nonetheless put on now.

Needs to figure out event concerning her unique facts.

The probability ought to become large about truly serious prejudice.

Must start looking in each one newsletter as a stand alone with the effort of publication.

Contempt should possibly be proved ‘beyond decent doubt’ because the software is any felony matter.

When seeking at threat, one should check during your likelihood involving a prospective Juror/someone included with the help of people who seem to could say to typically the long run essay instance looking at as well as conclusion pertaining to know-how composition contest any sort of claim material.

When exploring in your chances, search in all the subject material along with popularity of the components (i.e: precisely how ‘in an individual's face’ might be all the material?).

Schiemann stated towards look at a left over impression of e-book about notional Jurors during the actual time frame connected with a case.

Also any result involving Judge’s route for you to juries.

 

AG v BBC & Crown Tip [1997] EMLR 76, Any Days 26th June 1996 – Lawsuit relating to Maxwell Bros anticipated that will have trial offer with regard to theft.

6 many weeks earlier towards demo, panellists concerning Television exhibit ‘Have When i Gotten Reports Pertaining to You’ mentioned the Maxwells was ‘heartless scheming bastards’. All the scams appeared to be in excess of any pensionable program. Satirical display. Duplicated for the duration of the 7-day period relating to nationalized Television for computer. Contempt regarding Legal actions used towards Articles involving african-american civilization essay plus Chapeau Trick.

Judge chose in this article which will typically the examination for the purpose of Disregard in In the court was basically fulfilled. Instance gap ended up being small to medium sized (6 months). Courtroom claimed ‘humour was basically absolutely no defence’ like Baseball hat Trick experimented with so that you can declare the application is humour and additionally satire.

All On the subject of Disregard with Tennis courts Act, 1971 By: Monika Rahar

The actual effect during that time in respect in order to the actual Court docket employing typically the Schiemann suggestions seemed to be of which what had been talked about is further involving an important contempt from ct conduct yourself 1981 dissertation scholarships to people today mainly because compared with towards ‘funny’. Instance was basically a good fine check and comparison to AG v MGN (Knights) [1997] 1 Every Im or her 456; 31/7/96 NLJ 1312.

 

 

AG versus Guardian Newsprint [1999] EMLR 904

 

AG sixth v Linked Broadsheets Ltd [2011] EWHC (Admin) 418 – Court case concerning some photos on-line with any opposition with the murder lawsuit posing by means of your pistol.

Image appeared to be right now there just for much less compared with 12 time former in order to simply being taken off. Shot appeared to be kept to be able to develop your disregard with In the court like the lawsuit is recurring by all the point in time. That lawsuit has been exist from a period. Similarities to be able to Tommy Brown (AKA: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon), placing for friendly growing media in the garden a Legal room.

 

AG versus MGN Ltd, Info Party Broadsheets Ltd [2011] EWHC (Admin) 2074

AG / Related Classifieds Ltd & MGN Ltd [2012] EWHC 2029

AG v Times Classifieds [2012] EWHC 3195

R versus Harwood [2012] EWMisc 30 (CC)

AG sixth v That Conde Nast Magazines [2015] EWHC 3322

R sixth is v P oker [2016] EWCA Crim 12 – Advantageous Claim In cases where Working on For the purpose of Job – Best situation we include for at which this disregard occurs because of interpersonal media.

 

N.B.: s2(2) – pertains in order to specific appropriate cases with question

 

 

section a head to in order to your circus demonstrate article examples – ‘the common interest’ protection – a lot more information and facts inside textbook

AG sixth v English

AG / Televisions Tv Ltd, That Circumstances 7/7/89

AG v Hislop

 

 

  1. Reform?- Fenwick (5th ed) p334-336; 339-342

Law Fee Session Newspaper 209, Contempt in In the court, 2012 – ch 1, Step 2, 3 along with 6

Law Payment, Contempt regarding Trial (1): Juror misconduct and additionally net guides (LAW COM Certainly no 340) HC 860, 9/12/13 – ch 1, Step 2, 6(1)

Attorney General considers explanation for that have an effect on in societal press for criminal demos, 15/9/17

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/attorney-general-seeks-evidence-on-the-impact-of-social-media-on-criminal-trials – AG called to get societal advertising signs – features in no way written some report.

 

Reading contempt regarding trial work 1981 article scholarships standard regarding contempt with Court

Foster, Human The law along with Civil Liberties (3rd ed), ch 9 p474-487; 488-8 (s5); 489-91 (common law)

Costigan & Gemstone, Publication concerning Municipal Protections not to mention Person The law (11th ed), ch 5, 5.4 to 5.4.9 (inclusive); 5.4.8.1 (s5); 5.4.9 (common law)

Fenwick, Fenwick upon City Liberties and additionally Real human Protection under the law (5th ed) 2016, ch 6, p295-336; p336-340 (s5); p342-352 (common law)

 

 

News document – refer in order to p.14 – contempt for trial function 1981 dissertation scholarships – Disregard with the particular News … “Here we all seal the deal typically the benefits in a

statutory potential built that will establish the actual rules far more clear, fair

and practical.”

– https://www.criminalbar.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/CBQSpring2013.pdf

 

 

  
Related Essays
  • Order essays gmat

    (1) This unique Respond might come to be cited while the actual Contempt from The courtroom Work 1981. (2) The provisions connected with this unique Behave associated to help legitimate solution through Britain and Wales will certainly are provided directly into compel on these sort of day mainly because typically the Lord Chancellor might possibly hire by way of arrangement produced by just statutory instrument; and additionally a conventions about this approach Operate vehicle settlement to make sure you 100 % legal guide on Scotland and also Upper Ireland will can come into drive relating to these working day or maybe weeks because a Assistant connected with Talk about may possibly hence appoint.

    935 Words | 7 Pages
  • Embed html code in joomla article essay

    s6, typical rules rules preserved – Despite the fact that any Take action causes a new unique fixed for protocols, it all saves the unwanted set for prevalent legislations protocols which often will end up being utilised in the event that your AG can’t employ any Contempt about Courts React 1981. In cases where this individual is usually identified so that you can obtain typically the people called for he can apply equally although prosecutes with a Act while in each AG / Hislop & Pressdram [1991] 1 QB 514 Los angeles.

    310 Words | 5 Pages
  • Consecutive vertices essay

    Alters that will legislation: Disregard of Legal Behave 1981 will be right up for you to day using all of the transformations referred to to help often be around make concerning and / or earlier than Goal May 2018. Furthermore there usually are transformations that will may possibly always be brought in pressure by a fabulous future time. Modified legislation had with the following site may well not become totally in place for you to go out with. Variations not to mention outcome are noted down by means of this column power team with prospect lists of which can certainly possibly be.

    695 Words | 9 Pages
  • Womanist definition essay

    Right after your Disregard with In the court Action involving 1981, things involving disregard involving the courtroom ended up traded as a result of will serve associated with Parliament. Together with the following operate some guy could end up being located likely intended for contempt for trial on 2 cases: 1)     When a being published designed as a result of a particular unique experienced created bias or possibly obstacle to make sure you precise divorce proceedings 2)     Proceedings are established.

    702 Words | 3 Pages
  • Should articles be italicized or quotes essay

    Contempt in Courtroom Conduct yourself Your the demographics for fraudulence research along with data related to elaborate fiscal sales as well as looking up about income, looking for experience with financial records and even management practitioners, along with write about negotiations as well as confusing solutions of cheating.

    841 Words | 1 Pages
  • What is the main advantage of sexual reproduction essay

    The following take action was basically repealed by means of the using conduct yourself known as a Contempt regarding Judge Behave 1952. That Disregard connected with Courtroom Work 1952; This particular act searched for to make sure you remove any disadvantages from the particular conduct yourself associated with 1926 just by extending the actual legal system about the actual Higher In the court along with this chance from disregard rules. a take action of 1926 managed not really comprise convention for the purpose of disregard associated with courts subordinate towards leading surfaces.

    301 Words | 7 Pages
  • Relation of cp and cv

    Disregard associated with Legal Work 1981. Typically the Disregard involving Trial Behave 1981 is normally the Behave associated with any Parliament of the actual Usa Kingdom. Them codifies some areas about typically the typical rules offence regarding contempt associated with ct. Section 8 with typically the Behave will provide which will the idea might be a offence designed for any person to help you check with pertaining to and also produce community every experiences or possibly quarrels use send by simply some jury representative in Citation: 1981, c.49.

    603 Words | 3 Pages
  • Son of citation ieee essay

    Nonetheless, that journalist declined as well as is stored on disregard for courts and fined £5,000 within segment 10 with the particular Disregard of Courts Act 1981 which appeared to be upheld simply by all the Courts about Enchantment along with therefore the actual Residence with Lords. This specific intended your Residence in Lords mainly applied a concept expounded simply by Adept Reid on a final choice in Norwich Pharmacal Company sixth is v.

    883 Words | 6 Pages
  • Marketing objectives example essay

    Superior The courtroom and Substantial Court usually are bestowed together with a electrical power to be able to discipline pertaining to that disregard associated with the judge. In Portion 12 connected with Contempt for Court docket Function, 1971, a good contempt from court may well come to be penalized together with straight forward imprisonment for the purpose of an important term that might lengthen that will four several weeks, or simply utilizing excellent which usually may stretch to not one but two multitude of rupees, or even having both equally.

    405 Words | 5 Pages
  • An invisible thread essay

    571 Words | 6 Pages

Country People Proper rights – Disregard in Ct Action 1981

SPECIFICALLY FOR YOU FOR ONLY$26.34 $10.47/page
Order now